The Reasonable Person (Chapter 6) - Tort Law Criminal Law and Philosophy They are expected to act according to the same standard as a reasonable professional in their field. ), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (4th Series) (pp. Robinson, P. (2001). We routinely refer to reasonable time, reasonable delay, reasonable reliance, and reasonable care. Self-Defense Law: Overview - FindLaw A person must exercise the standard of care that would be expected of an ordinary, reasonable and prudent person in the same circumstances to avoid liability; It is an objective standard. Rather, reasonableness is a normative measure of ways in which it is right for persons to think, feel, or behave . Garvey, S. (2005). A review of the reasonable standard reveals its dependence on the facts of the situation. 0000004149 00000 n 943 (2019). Section 2.02(2)(c) captures this requirement that such risk taking involve a high degree of culpability, by requiring that it involve a gross deviation from the standards that a law-abiding conduct person would observethus implying that all such risk taking involves a deviation from the standards that a law-abiding person would observe. "Reasonable" is also frequently used for tax purposes. NY auto defense firm seeks experienced TRIAL ATTORNEY to do trials, motions, court appearances and depositions. Seventeen adopting states have changed law-abiding to reasonable. See Code of Alabama 13A-2-2(3); Alaska Statutes 04-21-080(a)(3); Arizona Revised Statutes. Theres a Lot of Backlog to Address: Why Mental Health in the Legal Profession Is Getting Worse, How Lawyers Can Make 'Living the Dream' a Reality, Law Firms Are Still Grasping for the 'Other Side' of Uncertainty, People, Places & Profits, Part I: A Look at the Talent Decisions Across the Full Am Law 200, Law Firm Leadership's Guide to Strategic Implementation of GPT-4, Protecting the Brand: Managing A Firm's Reputation in Times of Change and Crisis, Wealth Portfolio of $1 million+? Boston University Law Review, 72, 463554. Average persons, unfortunately, are perfectly capable of acting unlawfully by, for example, driving in excess of speed limits, downloading copyrighted material from the internet, avoiding taxes, ingesting controlled substances, looting in the context of natural disasters and riots, and even, as in Rwanda, engaging in genocide. How is the Supreme Court different from a regular trial court? Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Insufficient concern: A unified conception of criminal culpability. In Ryall v. Alsa Road Construction Ltd., 2004 ABPC 101, a construction company was sued by a visually impaired jogger who fell over a wooden barrier warning sign while running prior to sunrise. Reasonable legal minds agree that reasonableness is one of the foundational concepts of American law, infiltrating everything from administrative, corporate, and constitutional law to crimes, torts, and contracts. Thus, despite its being sometime said (albeit without supporting authority) that a reasonable person for purposes of heat of passion and duress is an average person, including average persons who are homophobic or cowardly, a reasonable person for purposes of duress is a person who manifests the kind of courage that society has a right to expect of persons; and a reasonable person for purposes of heat of passion is a right-minded person. This may result in assessing reasonableness on a stricter basis (Irwin at 42). \ @6X J2e@. Westen, P., & James, M. (2003). He favours neither the plaintiff nor the defendant. Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas. Terms of Service. These cases demonstrate that reasonably foreseeable risk is an essential component of liability and context is important in determining if negligence occurred. 532, 583 A.2d 718. The reasonable person is a hypothetical individual who approaches any situation with the appropriate amount of caution and then sensibly takes action. Behaviour that is consistent with established practices in a persons profession is less likely to be seen as negligent (ter Neuzen v. Korn, [1995] 3 SCR 674). The Nature of Reasonableness - Cornell Law Review Objective standard (law) - Wikipedia Equality, responsibility, and the law. If a person took medication that causes hallucinations for 1 in 1,000 people, the reasonable person arguably may or may not drive under those circumstances. 323, 326 (2012) (We put forward and defend the argument that normative definitions [of reasonableness] are categorically preferable to positive definitions because the latter are logically unacceptable.). Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. In fact, a recent flurry of analytic interpretations has onlyclouded the terms meaning.22. It is foreseeable that driving drunk could result in a car accident and injuries. Model Penal Code and Commentaries, 1985. About Us| Ripstein, A. 0000007372 00000 n There is no way to state this value judgment that does not beg the question in the last analysis; the point is that the jury must evaluate the actors conduct and determine whether it should be condemned). Michigan Law Review, 103, 10431080. Psychological studies have shown that people tend to overstate the predictability of past events (Irwin at 42). Primary factors to consider in ascertaining whether the person's conduct lacks reasonable care are the foreseeable likelihood that the person's conduct will result in harm, the foreseeable severity of any harm that may ensue, and the burden of precautions to eliminate or reduce the risk of harm. In former Justice Camps case, however, a disciplinary panel found that his comments deserved dismissal and he subsequently resigned. American Academy of Matrimonial Law, 14, 152192. The latest entry appeared just last year in the, https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2019/04/legal-theory-lexicon-the-. Courts consider the cost of preventing a liability in determining negligence. Moreover, it is worth noting that at least one of the terms with which reasonableness can be replaced as a measure of conduct in self defense, i.e., proportionate, is itself a prescriptive rather than descriptive term. In other cases, the situations are harder to determine. See Hart (1968: 15354); Moran (2003: 1857, 239); Simester (2000: 10203). Tort law is an umbrella field of law, which aims to correct injustices that have happened between individuals. Acceptable behaviour Work co-operatively with others in order to achieve objectives. Standard of care is an essential concept in determining whether a person was negligent and potentially liable for a tort. English courts later disagreed on whether age and gender were the only distinguishing traits under Camplin that were admissible on the issue of control or among the distinguishing traits. 1978) (construing Homicide Act, 1957, 6 Eliz. See, e.g., Minnesota Code 609.20(1) (2006) ([A person is guilty of manslaughter who] intentionally causes the death of another person in the heat of passion provoked by such words or acts of another as would provoke a person of ordinary self-control under like circumstances, provided that the crying of a child does not constitute provocation). However, it is not clear to me that they are right with respect to other usages of reasonableness as a measure of conduct. A legal standard applied to defendants in negligence cases to ascertain their liability. Attorney General for Jersey v. Holley (2005), 3 WLR 29. reasonable person n. : a fictional person with an ordinary degree of reason, prudence, care, foresight, or intelligence whose conduct, conclusion, or expectation in relation to a particular circumstance or fact is used as an objective standard by which to measure or determine something (as the existence of negligence) [we . In a negligence case, the defendant's actions are compared to those of a reasonable person faced with the same situation and surrounding context. To my knowledge, the Model Penal Code was the first to speak of individualization. See Model Penal Code and Commentaries (1985: 210.3, 62). Simons, K. (1992). The court stated that: [i]n order that the act may be negligent there must be not only a reasonable possibility of its happening, but also of injury being caused.. foreseeability | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Beyond the reasonable man? hYr}WS The information in this article was correct at time of publishing. When courts invoke the reasonable person as a means to assess culpability, they attribute to the standard some but not all of the objective and subjective characteristics of the accused. if a situation is fair, everyone is treated equally and in a reasonable way. 532, 583 A.2d 718 (1991) (limited to certain categories of provocation, not including mere taunting words). The standard of care usually revolves around the concept of the reasonable person standard: whether someone acted with care as the average person would have in those circumstances. Criminal law case studies (3rd ed.). See Director of Public Prosecutions v. Camplin [1978] 2 W.L.R. Cf. What is the significance of Fletcher v Peck quizlet? An impartial observer is not partial. Oxford: Clarendon Press. The reasonable person is a hypothetical person used as a legal standard to determine whether the conduct of the parties in a case was proper in the circumstances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 237, 241. 18, 302(b)(3). 117 (H.L.). Reasonable Person :: Legal Dictionary :: Justia This is due to the fact that the law of murder and defences of duress, provocation, and self-defence rely on this standard. What is the 'Reasonable Person' Standard? According to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), what is reasonable depends on the facts of each case, including the likelihood of a known or foreseeable harm, the gravity of that harm, and the burden or cost which would be incurred to prevent the injury. The Reasonable Person legal definition of The Reasonable Person Book review. The Centre for Public Legal Education respectfully acknowledges that we are located on Treaty 4, 6, 7, 8 and 10 territories, the traditional lands of First Nations, Mtis, and Inuit. Criminal law commonly requires judges and juries to decide whether defendants acted reasonably. Nevertheless, issues of reasonableness fall into two distinct categories: (1) where reasonableness concerns events and states, including risks of which an actor is conscious, that can be justly assessed without regard to the actors individual traits, and (2) where reasonableness concerns culpable mental states and emotions that cannot justly be assessed without reference to the actors capacities. a reasonable person would view a situation and then use that image as circumstantial evidence of a real person's state of mind.9 Sometimes courts apply this approach by asking whether a reasonable person would believe that a witness's testimony was honest or accurate.10 When the reasonable person is used in this manner, the actual inquiry is Reasonable Person. 720 5/4-6. Connecticut General Statutes 53a-3(13), 53a-19. Its usage and interpretation depend on what specifically is being considered: for example, damages for breach of contract must be what a reasonable person entering that contract would expect at the time the contract was entered, the care to be taken to . Nichomachean ethics. Individual characteristics are excluded such as intelligence, strength, maturity, or temperament; The reasonable person is not a particular person. It is generally agreed that risk is an epistemic concept and, hence, is defined by reference to a real or imaginary persons viewpoint. Pillsbury, S. (1998). startxref I am indebted to Doug Husak for this point. Sometimes, a judges preconceived notions can result in errant subjectivity. He is disinterested in the matter, as he treats both the plaintiff and the defendant alike. Site Map, Advertise| See State v. Cox, 532 N.W.2d 384, 388 (N.D. 1995) (construing N.D. ch. Or the conduct can consist of creating actual risks of such harms or evils, e.g., when the law punishes those who actually endanger others. See Lee (2003: 64) (referring to the laws hidden normativity in delegating authority to juries who, in turn, exercise it in sexist ways); Nourse (1997: 1388) (same). Peter Westen. Reasonable Person / Reasonable Man | Courthouse Libraries BC xref Defining the Reasonable Person in The Criminal Law: Fighting the The standard that courts use is that of "reasonability.". Dressler, J. To read more, click here: The Nature of Reasonableness. See MPC Commentary 2.02(2)(c)(d), pp. Robinson, P. (2003). !(gd8}CUkn!H-MN.T&VmT.t+rZRlIs|M;gWg[E)W$31u+^Bb=Ff:g="Nka:SAc|-0 BN;;7n |+~ UW6/st;Sj)=e'^Vx02E+D@d:"]j]]Ia@@CPZtfjXVe}k |'Y.Y}1:lS& =5(6lF`O@ 0C See Moran (2003: 7, 14, 163, 24857, 264, 286, 307); Ripstein (1998: 192) (the reasonable person in [the law's] sense is the person whose actions display appropriate regard for both her interests and the interests of others). See Robinson (2003). This is the basis of the reasonable personal standard. According to the courts, a reasonable person carefully avoids creating a foreseeable risk of injury to others. See note 47, supra. Passions puzzle. SeeAlan Z. Rozenshtein,Fourth Amendment Reasonableness AfterCarpenter, 128 YALEL.J.F. Solum,supranote 6. jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_1831_1_7').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_1831_1_7', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], }); Yet the problem with these approaches is not a lack of analytic rigor. MPC 210.3 (the 'reasonable [ness]' of extreme emotional disturbance partially exculpates persons of blame for homicide). Legal Resource Centre of Alberta In Wilde v. The Cambie Malone Corporation, 2008 BCSC 704, a woman was hit on the head by a restaurants patio umbrella that was blown toward her by the wind. He is disinterested in the matter, as he treats both the plaintiff and the defendant alike. In part, this is because the question of who the objective reasonable person is and what 'its' characteristics are must be answered to an 'A Huge Concern': Big Law Leaders Grappling With Attorney Disengagement. In the law of negligence, for example, the reasonable person standard is the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would observe under a given set of circumstances. Reasonable legal minds agree thatreasonablenessis one of the foundational concepts of American law, infiltrating everything from administrative, corporate, and constitutional law to crimes, torts, and contracts.11. 293, 299300 (2018) (describing this view of reasonableness as a search for the statistically average characteristics of people within a community). However, because the power company placed the wires above ground and removed the tree branches, the court found that the power company took adequate precaution. I propose an alternative approach that, in addition to applying to negligence and voluntary manslaughter cases alike, derives its content from the social practice of blaming. your institution. Middlesex: Penguin. In J. Horder (Ed. Southern California Law Review, 47, 12691309. Westen, P. (2007). For this usage of ex ante and ex post, see McMahan (2005). See Dressler (1982: 46566) (1982) (discussing courts and commentators who claim that provoked persons are unable to control themselves). See MPC Commentary, section 2.02(2)(c), p. 237. In doing so, the court held: The defendant should not be held guilty of negligence for not having foreseen the possibility of the occurrence of such an unlikely event as happened in this case and provided against it by the removal of the maple tree.. The industry-leading media platform offering competitive intelligence to prepare for today and anticipate opportunities for future success. 0000027106 00000 n In layman's terms, it refers to a hypothetically reasonable person with a reasonable way of interpreting and reacting to a situation of sexual harassment. It is the standard of conduct adopted by persons of ordinary intelligence and . Reasonable / Prudent Man Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc. In H. L. A. Hart (Ed. ", 2. New York Consolidated Law Service Penal 15.05(3). The substance of the section may well be conveyed without necessarily importing the concept of a reasonable man.). MPC and Commentaries (1985: 2.02, 237 n.14). 4 Wash. App. This is a preview of subscription content, access via 2 General observations related to the standard of the reasonable person from Common Law. The court also rejected the idea that imposing liability on the defendant would unfairly punish him because of his lower intelligence. This legal fiction steps into the shoes of the defendant and such a "person" is really an ideal, focusing on how a typical person, with ordinary prudence, would act in certain circumstances. See, e.g., People v. Cassasa, 49 N.Y.2d 668, 404 N.E.2d 1310 (1980) (the reasonableness of the defendants extreme emotional disturbance is entirely an issue of fact, not an issue of law). The reasonable person standard should consider the victim's perspective and not stereotyped notions of acceptable behavior. 0000015679 00000 n In Big Law, half of roughly 2,500 attorneys surveyed said unreasonable client demands negatively impacted their mental well-being. American Journal of Criminal Law, 26, 1109. Frank G. Millard Professor of Law, Michigan Law School, 115 Legal Research Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1215, USA, You can also search for this author in This cricket ground had been used for 90 years at the time of the case. Subjectivity gives rise to inconsistency which is not desirable in administering justice. A 10-year-old climbed up the tree and fell out. Westen, P. (2005). An actual risk of a harm or evil can always be said to have existed when, taking the viewpoint of society ex post, the harm or evil is known to have occurred. Lawyers at all levels ranked unreasonable client demands among their top sources of stress and anxiety in a recent survey, but clients say high fees and a lack of pushback further the unhealthy dynamic. (2003: 83338). Still, in a world where rights and wrongs swim in a sea of greys, the reasonable person standard is the best we have to balance consistency in the law with the nuances of life. Westen, P. Individualizing the Reasonable Person in Criminal Law. Can negligence be culpable? assault | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team. 85106). Therefore, reliance on a judge or jurys interpretation of facts and application of an objective standard of care is sometimes problematic. See, e.g., MPC 210.1, 2.02(2)(d) (the mental state of reasonable inadvertence to a risk of death exculpates persons of blame for homicide). at para. Where the harm has occurred unintentionally or due to carelessness, the court will apply the reasonable person standard. See Fletcher (1985: 949) (One of the most striking particularities of our discourse in its pervasive reliance on the term reasonable. Hugh Tredennick, trans. The cultural defense. Justice Tipping of New Zealand reported that Camplin, which New Zealand tried to follow, required mental gymnastics on the part of jurors, Regina v. Rongonui, [2000] 2 NZLR 385, para. See generally Renteln (2004). Associates look to partners for leadership in pushing back on unreasonable client requests, but cultural and systemic issues at law firms drive partners to side with clients. The MPC commentaries make it clear that to consciously take a substantial and unjustifiable risk is itself culpable, see MPC Commentaries (1985: 2.02, 237 nn.1415), albeit not sufficiently culpable to deserve criminal punishment. Such feedback should be evidence-based and delivered in an appropriate manner. Passions progress: Modern law reform and the provocation defense. jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_1831_1_3').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_1831_1_3', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });others believe it describes existing community values,44. Illinois Compiled Statutes, titl. For discussion of the possibility of a descriptive criminal law, see Michaels (2000). Negligence is the failure to use r easonable care to pr event harm to. Reasonable Person A phrase frequently used in tort and Criminal Law to denote a hypothetical person in society who exercises average care, skill, and judgment in conduct and who serves as a comparative standard for determining liability. The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change. Looking for articles like this one to be delivered right to your inbox? Cognition, Constitutional Law, Coordination, Emotion, Fairness, Feelings, Moral Psychology, Neuroscience, Reasonableness, Systems Science, Tort Law. 401.Basic Standard of Care. See also Moran (2003: 258); Tadros (2002: 227, 24143). jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_1831_1_4').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_1831_1_4', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });and still others see it as a combination of the two.55. (2000). See Terhune (1997). New York: New York University Press. %PDF-1.4 % With respect to a jurisdiction believes that it is normatively appropriate for persons to be motivated by ethnically-specific values, the instruction would be changed to allow a jury to take race or ethnicity into account. What is The Reasonable Person? 0000003020 00000 n Although the MPC does not make this requirement explicit, for the MPC to make sense, it ought to be regarded as implicit. Moreover, the court considered that it would cost very little to set up an inspection checklist and repair system for the employees putting up the umbrellas. Rationales of criminal law then and now: For a judgmental descriptivism. Murder and the reasonable man. Fletcher, G. (1985). Foreseeability asks how likely it was that a person could have anticipated the potential or actual results of their actions. Definition of The Reasonable Person in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. Described in Camplin (1978) as 'a person having the power of self-control to be expected of an ordinary person of the sex and age of the accused', the reasonable man's characteristics were nonetheless affected by the gravity of any provocation. I, section 2.02, p. 242. 1 1. Girouard v. State (1991), 321 Md. A reasonable person is a fair, proper and just and unbiased person. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of LawNow or the Centre for Public Legal Education Alberta. Customer Service| In Big Law, half of roughly 2,500 attorneys surveyed said unreasonable client demands negatively impacted their mental well-being. Mison, R. (1992). A person can be negligent by acting or by failing to act. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Bedder [1954] 1 W.L.R. "Reasonable" also operates in criminal law to achieve purposes independent of assessing an actor's responsibility. jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_1831_1_5').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_1831_1_5', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });This split is deepened by disagreements over the concepts normative basis. Rethinking the reasonable person: An egalitarian reconstruction of the objective standard. Both options are priced the same. Law.com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms financials, staffing, clients, news and events. The 'reasonable person standard' is a legal term often used in cases of sexual harassment. at 296 (arguing that[r]easonableness is best understood as a hybrid notion that is partly statistical and partly prescriptive). See N.D. Code 12.1-16-03 (2006) (A person is guilty of a class C felony if he negligently causes the death of another human being). jQuery('#footnote_plugin_tooltip_1831_1_2').tooltip({ tip: '#footnote_plugin_tooltip_text_1831_1_2', tipClass: 'footnote_tooltip', effect: 'fade', predelay: 0, fadeInSpeed: 200, delay: 400, fadeOutSpeed: 200, position: 'top right', relative: true, offset: [10, 10], });While some scholars say reasonableness is a prescriptive standard,33. Buffalo Criminal LawReview, 6, 833950. The defendant was warned that the haystack was poorly constructed, but ignored this advice. Those with superior skill and knowledge, such as doctors, lawyers, architects, engineers and police officers,are held to a higher standard taking into account their expertise. Unfortunately, the haystack spontaneously combusted and destroyed some of the plaintiffs property. The terms appropriate and reasonable are stand-ins for the unavoidable normative determinations that triers of fact must make regarding when a persons failure to manage his disposition for inadvertence manifests sufficient disregard for the interests of others to merit condemnation. Reasonable Person / Reasonable ManLast revised October 30, 2019. Individualizing the Reasonable Person in Criminal Law Reasonable also operates in criminal law to achieve purposes independent of assessing an actors responsibility. The Court noted that in the previous six years, the ball had only been hit onto the highway six times and no one had ever been injured. No consideration is given to the defendants thought process or personal awareness of danger. Enforcement Guidance on Harris v. Forklift Sys. Inc. 2131, 216065 (2015) (proposing a theory of reasonableness as mutuality); Lawrence B. Solum,Legal Theory Lexicon: The Reasonable Person, LEGALTHEORYBLOG(Apr. trailer However, even this exception is limited. This does not prevent a single statutory reference to reasonable from serving each function in turn. An impartial observer is not partial. See N.D. Negligence claims must prove four things in court: duty, breach, causation, and damages/harm. Tadros, V. (2002). Reasonable / Prudent Man Law and Legal Definition. Together, these attributes suggest that reasonableness is not an abstract, static, or monolithic ideal; rather, it is an organic, dynamic, and systemic phenomenon for satisfying our natural urge for homeostasis. See Westen (2007: 255 n.42). Access to additional free ALM publications, 1 free article* across the ALM subscription network every 30 days, Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications, Include International Edition The American Lawyer, Brought to you by ONE Advisory Partners, LLC. McMahan, J. Garvey, S. (2006). Harm must be a "reasonably foreseeable" result of the defendant's conduct; A relationship of "proximity" must exist between the defendant and the claimant; It must be "fair, just and reasonable" to impose liability. United States v. Roston (1993) 986 F.2d 1287, 1294. 53a-19 (2007) (A person is justified in using reasonable physical force upon another person to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of physical force) (emphasis added). Defences may be used such as contributory negligence in some cases. Rethinking mental states. Philadelphia: American Law Institute. "Reasonable Person" Standard in a Personal Injury Legal Case Columbia Law Review, 96, 269374. If that is not the case, this provision would have to be deleted. His wife and colleagues at Southwestern Law School wish to dedicate this Essay to his memory. The Standard of the Reasonable Person in the Criminal Law Reasonable Person Standard: Legal Definition & Examples Alexander, L. (2000). (2000). Code, 12.1-05-08 (2005) (A person's conduct is excused if he believes that the facts are such that his conduct is necessary and appropriate for any of the purposes which would establish a justification or excuse under this chapter, even though his belief is mistaken.
Jcc Toronto Membership Fees,
Sheldon Reservoir Body Found,
Medicaid Vehicle Exemption,
Summit Ministries Staff,
Articles R